Paclitaxel-eluting stents: are they all equal? An analysis of six randomized controlled trials in de novo lesions of 3,319 patients.

نویسنده

  • Sigmund Silber
چکیده

In Germany, four different drug eluting stents (DES) systems are currently commercially available. Whereas sirolimus has been clinically tested in only a single type of stent with a single type of coating in only a single dose, paclitaxel has been tested on various stent designs, in various dose densities, and in various release formulations with or without a polymer carrier. Therefore, the question arises: are all paclitaxel stents equally safe and effective? Six clinical randomized trials investigated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de-novo lesions: TAXUS-I (61 pats), TAXUS-II (536 pats), ASPECT (177 pats), ELUTES (190 pats), DELIVER-I (1041 pats) and TAXUS-IV (1314 pats). In the TAXUS-series, paclitaxel released from the stent was controlled by the Translute polymer. In the other studies, however, no polymer carrier was used. In TAXUS-I, II & IV, the dose density of 1 microg/mm2 significantly reduced angiographic parameters of restenosis and improved clinical outcomes. In ASPECT and ELUTES there was a dose-dependent effect on angiographic parameters of restenosis with the best results for a paclitaxel dose density of approximately 3.0 microg/mm2. Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months, however, were not improved in these studies without coating. The studies unanimously show that the paclitaxel-eluting stents are safe, if clopidogrel is added to ASA for 3 to 6 months. The safety of paclitaxel-eluting stents is independent of the stent design, the dose density and the presence or absence of a polymer carrier system. For paclitaxel-eluting stents using a polymer carrier, the dose density of 1 microg/mm2 is highly effective, whereas for paclitaxel-eluting stents without a polymer carrier, the minimal effective dose density is much higher (3 microg/mm2). Despite their improvement of angiographic parameters, paclitaxel-eluting stents without a polymer carrier did not demonstrate a positive effect on clinical outcome. In contrast, polymer-based paclitaxel elution produced significant clinical benefit.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bare metal stent versus paclitaxel eluting stent for intermediate length femoropopliteal arterial lesions (BATTLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Currently, endovascular treatment is indicated to treat femoropopliteal lesions ≤15 cm. However, the Achilles' heel of femoropopliteal endovascular repair remains restenosis. Paclitaxel eluting stents have shown promising results to prevent restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A recently released prospective registry using a newer g...

متن کامل

Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of reference vessel diameter (RVD) and lesion length (LL) on the relative safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). BACKGROUND Lesion length and RVD are well-known predictors of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS Patient-level data were pooled from t...

متن کامل

Drug eluting balloons for de novo coronary lesions – a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The role of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) is unclear. Increasing evidence has shown a benefit for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Its effect on de novo coronary lesions is more controversial. Several smaller randomized trials found conflicting results. METHODS This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effect of local Pacl...

متن کامل

Meta-Analysis of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease

Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of the final 3-year results from the international SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) II, III, and IV clinical trials. Individual patient data from 4,989 patients who were prospectively randomized to treatment with EES (n 1⁄4 3,350) or ...

متن کامل

Sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

CONTEXT Placement of sirolimus-eluting stents or paclitaxel-eluting stents has emerged as the predominant percutaneous treatment strategy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether there are any differences in efficacy and safety between these 2 drug-eluting stents is unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents on the basis o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of interventional cardiology

دوره 16 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003